• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

Before Header

Call Now to Schedule a Consultation: (208) 571-0627

Atkinson Law Office Logo

Passionate Criminal Defense & Family Law Attorneys

Header Right

Please read our COVID-19 UPDATE for information on consultations and court proceedings.
  • COVID-19 Update
  • Criminal Defense Attorney
    • Drug Crime
    • DUI
    • DWP
    • Inattentive and Reckless Driving
    • Sex Offender Lawyer
    • Theft
    • Violent Crime
      • Aggravated Assault & Battery
      • Domestic Violence Attorney
  • Family Law Attorney
    • Divorce
    • Child Custody
  • Meet Your Attorney
    • Craig Atkinson
    • Dinko Hadzic
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
    • (208) 571-0627
  • Client Portal
  • COVID-19 Update
  • Criminal Defense Attorney
    • Drug Crime
    • DUI
    • DWP
    • Inattentive and Reckless Driving
    • Sex Offender Lawyer
    • Theft
    • Violent Crime
      • Aggravated Assault & Battery
      • Domestic Violence Attorney
  • Family Law Attorney
    • Divorce
    • Child Custody
  • Meet Your Attorney
    • Craig Atkinson
    • Dinko Hadzic
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
    • (208) 571-0627
  • Client Portal
Home » Idaho Law Blog » Mother of missing Kansas City baby failed polygraph. Did she lie?

Mother of missing Kansas City baby failed polygraph. Did she lie?

October 7, 2011 //  by Craig Atkinson

It appears from the headlines today that Deborah Bradley, the mother of the missing 10 month old girl that disappeared from her crib in Kansas City, has failed a polygraph that was administered by the Kansas City Police.

For those of you who are unfamiliar with what a polygraph is, a polygraph is a test given to an individual while asking them a series of questions. During the test the physiological reactions to the asked questions are measured, and a “trained professional” determines by the results whether the individual is being truthful or not. Typically the examiner will be able to conclude whether the individual is being deceptive, truthful, or the test will be inconclusive. In other words, a polygraph is what is known as a “lie detector test.”

The fact of the matter is, the scientific community holds polygraph results to be less than credible. A psychology professor, right here at our own Boise State University, has opined that polygraph examinations give a high rate of false positives to innocent people.

When it comes right down to it, it does not make sense for anyone to submit to a polygraph examination. They are scientifically unreliable, and more importantly the legal community themselves, from police officers and prosecutors to criminal defense attorneys, all believe polygraph examinations to be voodoo. When a defendant passes a polygraph, the police insist that the defendant take another one, and when the defendant refuses, the police charge him anyway. Additionally, polygraph results have been held unreliable by the Courts, and for that reason polygraph results are inadmissible as evidence.  That means neither the defense nor the prosecution may use them to prove innocence or guilt.

The sole purpose of a polygraph examination is for the interrogation value. The police tell you they want you to come down so they can “clear you as a suspect,” or “rule you out,” or “clear your good name,” etc. What the police are really doing is seizing the opportunity to interrogate you. They know they will have you over a barrel, and they also know that for all you know the polygraph examination is a credible examination, and so you will be honest and cooperative in hopes of passing the test. If and when you fail the test, the police will then take the opportunity to use that fact against you in the interrogation to break your spirit, and cause you to incriminate yourself even further. If you are lucky and pass the test, well they can still charge you, and successful polygraph results will not be admissible at a trial.

Never submit to a polygraph examination. It cannot help you, it will only hurt you. Always exercise your right to remain silent whenever a law enforcement officer directly or indirectly accuses you of wrong doing.

Maybe Deborah Bradley is guilty, maybe she’s innocent, but the failed polygraph does not assist me in forming an opinion either way.

Filed Under: Opinion

Previous Post: « Top five rules to abide by if you have been accused of a crime.
Next Post: Do juries get it wrong? Trial Jury»

DISCLAIMER: THIS BLOG/WEBSITE IS MADE AVAILABLE BY THE LAWYER OR LAW FIRM PUBLISHER FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AS WELL AS TO GIVE YOU GENERAL INFORMATION AND A GENERAL UNDERSTANDING OF THE LAW, NOT TO PROVIDE SPECIFIC LEGAL ADVICE. BY USING THIS BLOG SITE YOU UNDERSTAND THAT THERE IS NO ATTORNEY CLIENT RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN YOU AND THE BLOG/WEB SITE PUBLISHER. THE BLOG/WEB SITE SHOULD NOT BE USED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR COMPETENT LEGAL ADVICE FROM A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ATTORNEY IN YOUR STATE.
© 2023 ATKINSON LAW OFFICE · DIGITALLY DEFENDED BY CYBERLICIOUS